|
HAMMER
|
|
| In hindsight, the Mercury's fit my hull design a lot better as their lower units are much more forgiving compared to the Suzuki's which have proven difficult to set up on this boat. The problem seems to be the Suzuki's do not stay hooked up at speeds over 50mph. The problem ,I think is the raised keel pad which may be lifting the props into the disturbed water that is exiting around the raised pad. Mercs did ok with this Zukes, not so much. One engine, usually the port, starts to ventilate around 50mph thereby stopping the engines from achieving WOT rpm. I tried a lot of different props, each with different designs and all had this same problem. I went back to four blade round ear's, and these worked the best so far. With the round ear, when the boat is light, I can trim the engines out past hull level and lift the bow and this allows the props to be buried enough to finally achieve WOT rpm. I did not find that the large OD (16"D) props worked well and the much smaller 14 1/4"D Turbo Ultima four blades have provided the best overall performance so far. Now I am running a set of unmatched props, the port is a Turbo Fusion four blade 14 1/4 X 23P and the Starboard is a Turbo Ultima four blade 14 1/4 X 23P. These are about 1" to 1 1/2" too much pitch and probably a set of 21"P Turbo Ultimas would be the closest that I can buy to what I need.
Turbo Offshore I 15x24P rpm
mph %slip
mpg 3600
32 18.6
1.95 4000
38 13.1
1.9 4500
45 8.5
1.6 4900
50 6.6
1.4 5450
53 11
-
PowerTech OFX 15 1/4X22P 4400
39.5 10.4
1.65 4600
41 11.0
1.58 4900
45
8.3 1.38 5900
52.5
11.2 1.1 Turbo
Ultima 4 14 1/4X21P 3500
27
19.3 1.75 4000
36.5 4.0
1.8 4500
40.9 4.9
1.73 5500
50.8 3.4
1.33 "Pair"
port Turbo Fusion 14 1/4X 23P starboard
Ultima4 14 1/4X23P motor
dropped to 1st hole. 3500
33
10.0% 1.97 4000
40
4.59 1.82
4400
44.4 3.6
1.62 4500
45.6 3.29
1.63 5000
50.9 2.8
1.36 5600
57.4 2.19
1.3 WOT achieved at
last!!
|
|
Send mail to knotreel@bellsouth.net
with questions or comments about this web site. |